SCHEDA DI VALUTAZIONE

# Fattori di valutazione Punteggio Breve giustificazione del punteggio

1 OriginalitÓ del Progetto e suo contributo al progresso delle Conoscenze scientifiche  8 buono
 
The different directions of investigation are all pertinent. The idea to analyse the different methods in a research group is interesting. However it will not be easy to coordinate them. 
2 Chiarezza e verificabilitÓ degli obiettivi  8 buono
 
Due to the high complexity of the problems approached it is difficult to establish a research schedule. However the assigned tasks are appropriate. 
3 Appropriatezza dei metodi e delle tecniche da utilizzare  8 buono
 
The methods and techniques suggested are all appropriate. 
4 Adeguatezza delle risorse  7 discreto
 
The overall budget is modest with respect to the importance and extend of the topic studied. 

5 Competenza del coordinatore scientifico  10 eccellente
 
No doubt about the academic competence which is internationally recognized. 
6 Competenza dei gruppi proponenti  8 buono
 
Their contributions in the field of the project are significant. 
7 ComplementaritÓ dei gruppi proponenti  8 buono
 
The different groups complement themself in an adequate way. 


Commento generale


I am surprised to see that most of the budget is allocated to "Travel & subsidies" and "Participation to conf. & workshops".
Does there exist a procedure to evaluate the outcomes of the project at the end of the period?

The group has the potential to produce interesting results.


Punteggio finale 57 / 70

Ritiene il progetto finanziabile? SI

L'entitÓ del finanziamento richiesto Ŕ: Congrua